|
|  |

It's not always about technology
When the focus is on how technology can advance economic opportunities in
low-income communities, the temptation is to consider technology as itself
being the solution. However, we need to start our search for solutions
with the people, the leaders, and the organizations that are living in and
serving low-income communities, not with the technology per se. As Josh
Senyak & Albert Fong wrote in a recent TechSoup article,
"Bridging the Digital Divide: Thinking about community
technology":
"As it turns out, the best computer access
in the world won't get you into Stanford if you can't read and write.
And while thousands of programming positions are available on-line,
they'll probably go to somebody else if you don't have the resources to
set up your childcare, a decent suit of clothes, and a ride to the
interview. Technology really hasn't changed the fundamental rules of the
game very much. All the handicaps in the race continue to favor the
'haves.' The real barriers to opportunity-language, education, literacy,
poverty, discrimination-are left untouched."
It's the individuals and organizations that people turn to for help
with their daily challenges who can best define the community's needs and
the ways technology applications can be leveraged around the community's
strengths and assets. The first step is in helping these leaders
understand how technology works and what its potential is (and isn't) for
them and for their communities. Then, working through these trusted
agents, appropriate applications of technology can be developed to create
economic opportunity. Only then will the real power of technology begin to
be harnessed in ways that help create new ground for progress.
Question: Are there specific examples or vignettes we could use to
reinforce our position on the use of trusted agents in the community that
have led to applications of technology resulting in economic opportunity?
Randal, what has been your experience on this issue, based upon your
work in Camfield Estates?
This is the last of the installments: Where I could really use help is
in identifying examples where applications of technology in low-income
communities have helped people in getting jobs, creating new jobs, or
encouraging people to start their own businesses.
Thanks.
Bob
<<To previous post
| To next post>>
Back to summary
| |
 |